fumigatus, a discrimination between A. lentulus and A. fumigatus could be established, but not for distinguishing other Aspergillus spp. from A. fumigatus (Balajee et al., 2006). To bypass this limitation, Staab et al. (2009) designed a PCR-RFLP technique relying on the presence of BccI polymorphisms within a benA gene fragment

that are unique for A. fumigatus, A. lentulus and N. udagawae. However, an important limitation arose again, namely the inability to distinguish phylogenetically closely related A. fumigatus, A. fumigatus var. ellipticus and N. fischeri isolates. The restriction method developed Navitoclax nmr in this study helps to partly overcome this drawback as it discriminates between A. fumigatus and A. fumigatus var. ellipticus. It is therefore recommended to use the BccI restriction analysis of benA to discriminate between A. fumigatus, A. lentulus and N. udagawae and to use the HinfI restriction analysis of rodA to further distinguish between A. fumigatus and A. fumigatus var. ellipticus. This identification scheme

was experimentally proven in this study for the type strains of A. fumigatus and important closely related species. According to this identification scheme, the FH6 isolate should be most likely identified as A. fumigatus selleck isolate instead of A. lentulus as described in GenBank. However, restriction-based distinction between A. fumigatus var. fumigatus and N. fischeri is, however, still not feasible. E. Van Pamel et al. (unpublished data) indicated a discrepancy in gliotoxin production between the A. fumigatus and A. fumigatus var. ellipticus isolates, with significantly more isolates within the cluster of A. fumigatus var. ellipticus producing gliotoxin and in much higher amounts. This finding, as well as the role that gliotoxin likely plays in virulence enhancement (Kupfahl et al., 2006; Hof & Kupfahl, 2009; Kwon-Chung & Sugui, 2009), makes it very interesting to evaluate the possible

virulence characteristics of the variant ellipticus in future research. In addition, more research is needed to evaluate the importance of this variant in invasive infections. Although it appears that A. fumigatus is the main causative agent of invasive aspergillosis, studies have revealed that other related Aspergillus spp. may contribute to Fenbendazole such invasive infections as well (Jarv et al., 2004; Balajee et al., 2005a, 2006). As multiple clinically important members of the Aspergillus section Fumigati are difficult to distinguish on the basis of morphological features (Staab et al., 2009), it is likely that invasive infections could possibly be partly attributed to isolates of A. lentulus, A. fumigatus var. ellipticus, N. fischeri and N. udagawae as well. Accurate, multidisciplinary (re)identification of Aspergillus isolates involved in invasive infection could contribute to elucidate the true causing species of such infections.