Three experienced radiologists visually assessed the image quality and they manually measured the stenotic severity.\n\nResults: Fewer measurement errors occurred with multisector reconstruction (p = 0.05), a slower HR (p < 0.001) and a larger luminal diameter (p = 0.014); measurement errors were not related with the observers or the stenotic severity. There was no significant difference in measurements as for the reconstruction

algorithms below an HR of 70 bpm. More nonassessable segments CX-6258 supplier were visualized with halfscan reconstruction (p = 0.004) and higher HRs (p < 0.001). Halfscan reconstruction had better quality scores when the HR was below 60 bpm, while multisector reconstruction had better quality scores when the HR was above 90 bpm. For the H PIS between 60 and 90 bpm, BVD-523 order both reconstruction modes had similar quality scores. With excluding the nonassessable segments, both reconstruction algorithms achieved a similar mean measured stenotic severity and similar

standard deviations.\n\nConclusion: At a higher HR (above 90 bpm), multisector reconstruction had better temporal resolution, fewer nonassessable segments, better quality scores better accuracy of measuring the stenotic severity in this phantom study.”
“Transpulmonary Atrial Pacing. Introduction: Patients with prior extracardiac (EC) conduit Fontan surgery are considered ineligible for transvenous atrial pacemaker implantation due to lack of venous access to the atrial myocardium. A new technique for atrial lead placement in the setting of this surgical anatomy is proposed. Methods and Results: A 30-year-old female with prior EC Fontan surgery, incessant

supraventricular this website tachycardia, sinus node dysfunction, and multi-organ failure was admitted to our hospital. After placement of a transvenous lead in the left pulmonary artery (LPA) for temporary pacing with ensuing clinical improvement, the patient was taken back to the catheterization laboratory for definitive treatment. After ablation of the supraventricular tachycardia and 3D mapping of the common atrium, a puncture through the LPA and into the left-sided atrium was performed. A transvenous lead was then attached to the base of the left-sided appendage where excellent pacing and sensing characteristics were observed. Follow-up transesophageal echocardiography revealed stable lead placement and absence of pericardial effusion. The patient was discharged to home several days later on warfarin therapy. Conclusions: Transpulmonary access to the left-sided atrium for patients with prior EC Fontan surgery is a feasible strategy for transvenous atrial pacing. Lead placement in this location is associated with excellent pacing characteristics and involves a limited segment of lead within the pulmonary venous atrium. The approach is technically straightforward and avoids the need for surgical pacemaker placement.