The results with cholesterol homeostasis genes correlated with changes in nuclear localization of key regulators of cholesterol and bile acid homeostasis (e.g., sterol regulatory element binding protein-2 and liver receptor homolog-1); however, the pattern of these changes was less clear. For example, although expression of CYP7A1 in foz/foz mice fed HFD was less than half that of WT mice fed chow, nuclear localization of liver receptor homolog-1 was not different between these groups.

The authors then showed that insulin in vitro at similar levels found in foz/foz mice (up to 20 ng/mL)13 changed the expression of some of the cholesterol synthesis genes in a pattern similar to what was observed in vivo (e.g., sterol regulatory element binding protein-1, low-density lipoprotein receptor, and bile acid GSK1120212 cell line export protein). These in vitro results, although supportive of the concept that the authors promote, have some limitations. First, the authors did www.selleckchem.com/products/AZD2281(Olaparib).html not study the effect of these insulin concentrations directly on cholesterol flux in these cells. Second, these results ignore the fact that plasma insulin levels are equally elevated in foz/foz mice fed chow,13 which would imply that they would expect similar expression changes with

foz/foz mice on chow diet, which was not observed in their animal models (see Figs. 1-3 in van Rooyen DM et al.10). The last series of experiments are to test the effect of titrating cholesterol into the standard HFD on liver damage in the foz/foz mice. The results demonstrate that foz/foz mice accumulate CE and FC and develop inflammatory liver damage even on HFD without cholesterol and that these variables increase as the percentage of dietary cholesterol rises. Interestingly, HFD-fed WT mice do not develop significant liver

injury until dietary cholesterol 上海皓元医药股份有限公司 levels are high enough to accumulate in the liver. However, it should be noted that there are key differences between WT and foz/foz mice that cannot be explained simply by differential abilities to accumulate cholesterol. For example, at even the highest concentration of cholesterol (2%), the authors observed few fibrotic changes in WT mice, which is in contrast to foz/foz mice that were fibrotic even in the absence of added dietary cholesterol (see Fig. 6 in van Rooyen DM et al.10). Issues that remain after this study include whether the results observed here are specific to Alström syndrome, or are more generally applicable to fatty liver disease. First, it is unclear if the magnitude of increase in cholesterol observed in this study is relevant to human fatty liver disease. For example, hepatic CE levels do not differ between control, NAFLD and NASH in humans, but were >50-fold higher in foz/foz mice.11 Furthermore, hepatic FC levels are only 20% elevated in NASH versus NAFL, versus a much stronger increase in foz/foz mice.