5%) in the onabotulinumtoxinA group and upper respiratory tract infection (5.3%) in the placebo group. Most AEs were mild

or moderate in severity and resolved without sequelae. Serious AEs were reported for 4.8% of patients in the onabotulinumtoxinA group and 2.3% of patients in the placebo group. Treatment-related AEs of neck pain, muscular weakness, and eyelid ptosis were reported by a higher number of patients in the onabotulinumtoxinA group than in the placebo group (Table 4). Similarly to what was found in each individual study,32,33 in the pooled analysis the only treatment-related AE reported with an incidence ≥5% was neck pain (6.7% in the onabotulinumtoxinA group vs 2.2% in the placebo group). The incidence rates for individual treatment-related AEs were consistent with the known pharmacology and Deforolimus solubility dmso established safety of onabotulinumtoxinA when injected into head and neck muscles. No unexpected treatment-related AEs were identified. In this pooled analysis of the 24-week double-blind PREEMPT phases, 3.8% of patients in the onabotulinumtoxinA group and 1.2% of patients in the placebo group discontinued due to AEs (Table 3). The most frequently this website reported AEs leading to discontinuation in the onabotulinumtoxinA group were neck pain (0.6%), muscular weakness (0.4%),

headache (0.4%), and migraine (0.4%). No death was reported in the studies. Historically, patients with CM have been excluded from migraine prophylaxis trials because they were considered to be too highly disabled and treatment resistant. However, the high prevalence and great burden of illness suffered by those with CM calls for the development and evaluation of efficacious, safe, and well-tolerated headache prophylaxis therapies. The individual PREEMPT studies were conducted simultaneously with essentially identical designs, allowing the results to be pooled to determine the

precision of and variability 上海皓元 around the results for the primary and all secondary endpoints. The results of this pooled analysis demonstrate highly significant differences favoring onabotulinumtoxinA over placebo across multiple headache symptom measures, including the primary endpoint of headache day frequency and all secondary efficacy endpoints, with the exception of acute pain medication intakes. However, in the pooled analysis, as seen in both PREEMPT 1 and 2 studies, there were significant differences favoring onabotulinumtoxinA over placebo for the change from baseline in frequency of triptan intakes. Furthermore, despite a baseline imbalance in the pooled analysis for the frequency of headache episodes and, separately, frequency of migraine episodes, the power of the pooled analysis demonstrated highly significant differences (P ≤ .004) favoring onabotulinumtoxinA over placebo for the change from baseline in frequencies of headache episodes and migraine episodes, which had been observed in PREEMPT 2 but not in PREEMPT 1.