0 ± 27%; P=0001), but not the ATV/r arm (–37 ± 30%, P=01; di

0 ± 2.7%; P=0.001), but not the ATV/r arm (–3.7 ± 3.0%, P=0.1; difference –6.3 ± 4.1%; P=0.1). Finally, a further buy Thiazovivin increase in apoA1 was seen in both arms between weeks 24 and 48, with a significant total increase over 48 weeks of+11.7 ± 3.0% in the SQV/r arm and+9.4 ± 2.2% in the ATV/r arm (difference 2.3 ± 3.7%; P=0.5). LDL cholesterol, TG and apoB did not change significantly over 24 or 48 weeks in either arm. The OT analyses confirmed these results but showed a significant difference in change in HDL cholesterol between the arms. However, the apparent

significant absolute difference between the arms in HDL cholesterol in the univariate analysis was not confirmed in the multivariate analysis after adjusting for gender, baseline Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) disease stage, CD4 T-cell count, HDL

cholesterol, homeostasis model assessment (HOMA), body weight and limb fat. Three patients (all in the ATV/r arm) were using lipid-lowering medication until the end of the study, two of whom were already using this treatment at screening. Analyses were unchanged after excluding these patients (data not shown). Insulin and HOMA had increased significantly in both treatment arms after 24 weeks (Table 2), but without a significant difference between arms (difference in insulin +32.6 ± 24.9%, P=0.19; in HOMA+44.8 ± 29.3%, P=0.13). After 48 weeks, however, changes in insulin and HOMA were no longer significant, and there was still no significant difference

between the treatment arms. selleck products Only fasting glucose increased significantly in the ATV/r arm (+6.3 ± 2.7%; P=0.02), but not in the SQV/r arm (+1.0 ± 2.1%; P=1.0), after 48 weeks (difference 5.3 ± 3.5%; P=0.1). Centrally read CT and whole-body DXA scans were performed in all 86 non-SSAR 2004/0002 patients (SQV/r arm, n=41; ATV/r arm, n=45). For 67 patients, a complete set of scans was available. All body composition parameters were comparable between the arms at baseline. In the ITT analysis, body weight, lean body mass, total body fat, trunk fat O-methylated flavonoid and limb fat increased significantly in the ATV/r arm, but not in the SQV/r arm (Table 3). Only the increase in body weight and limb fat was significantly greater in the ATV/r arm than in the SQV/r arm. TAT, SAT and VAT each increased significantly in the ATV/r arm, but not in the SQV/r arm. Only the difference in TAT and SAT change was significant between the arms. The VAT/SAT ratio did not change significantly over 48 weeks in either arm. A limb fat loss of>20% relative to baseline occurred in three patients in the SQV/r arm and two patients in the ATV/r arm, but each of these patients concomitantly also showed loss of VAT and generalized weight loss.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>