On the other hand, the lattice constant of the 1D structure (2 9

On the other hand, the lattice constant of the 1D structure (2.9 nm) is significantly higher than the SMMs’ size over large range. Although no preferred orientation was observed, the driving force for the latter structure is very much likely caused by a stronger click here interaction of the SMM with the substrate compared with the 2D structure. Model of the adsorption

of [MnIII 6CrIII](ClO4)3 on top of HOPG [Mn III 6 Cr III ] 3+ has, besides others, three methyl groups at the top and three at the bottom. These three methyl groups span a plane perpendicular to the vertical axis of the SMM. The methyl groups are assumed to bind to the HOPG surface by C-H/π interactions. The binding is suggested to be of hollow site type which is supported by own calculations and consistent with [27–29]. The distance of the three methyl Tideglusib groups to each other is 0.65 nm [30] leading to two orientations in which the SMM can adsorb to hollow site positions on HOPG as depicted with the red equilateral triangle in Figure 5a,b. Figure 5 Model of adsorption sites. (a) Adsorption sites of [Mn III 6 Cr III ] 3+ on HOPG. (b) [Mn III 6 Cr

III ] 3+ adsorbs on HOPG with its methyl groups find more fitting exactly the shown sites forming an equilateral triangle. (c) Model of the lattice of [Mn III 6 Cr III ] 3+ on HOPG matching our data with respect to the angle and periods. The circles illustrate the molecule’s size measured in crystal [30]. This gives us Dolutegravir nmr a model which depends on four variables. These are to match the acquired datasets consisting out of three parameters: the two periods and the angle between them. The best fit received is shown in Figure 5c. In this model, we have two periods, 2.28 and 2.34 nm, and an angle between

the orientations of 87.2° which is in agreement with the experimental results, within their uncertainties. The lack of observation of SMM stacking and Volmer-Weber growth when using (ClO4)- as anion implies a stronger interaction between the substrate and the SMM than between two SMMs. In the case of the texture shown in Figure 3, a stronger SMM-substrate interaction than that inside the layer of Figure 4a must take place because the orientation of the texture is kept over an area of 0.125 μm2 whereby the area is almost fully separated in two islands as given in Figure 1. Islands of SMMs with half the height of full ones We observe structures resembling islands of monolayers of [Mn III 6 Cr III ](ClO4)3 with a height of 1.0 ± 0.1 nm as given in Figure 1c. Besides these heights, we also found islands at other positions outside Figure 1 with just approximately half the height of a SMM, 0.50 ± 0.05 nm. Figure 6 shows an island covering 29% of the image with a height of 0.5 nm and a second island covering 7% of the image with a height of 1 nm. In addition, a cluster of molecules with a height of over 4 nm occurs which exhibits no internal structure.

Comments are closed.