Stakeholders’ views on pharmacist prescribing training learn more in the community setting could also be explored. “
“Objectives  To determine whether pharmacy-based cardiovascular disease (CVD) screening reached the desired population, the local population’s awareness of pharmacy screening and the views of service users and the general public about CVD screening. Methods  Pharmacy staff, located in one English Primary Care Trust providing a CVD screening service, issued questionnaires to service users who had undergone screening. Face-to-face street surveys were conducted with members of the general public within the vicinity of

each participating pharmacy. Key findings  A total of 259 people were screened within the first 6 months of service provision, 97 of whom (37.4%) Selleckchem GSK2126458 completed the evaluation questionnaire. In addition,

261 non-service users participated in street surveys. Most respondents among both service users and non-users had at least one risk factor for cardiovascular disease, including smoking and lack of exercise. Responses to statements regarding CVD screening showed a high level of agreement with the need for screening in both groups. However, significantly more service users (90.7%) agreed that a pharmacy was a good place for screening compared to the non-users (77.4%; P < 0.005). Likewise significantly fewer service users agreed that screening should be only carried out by doctors (10.3 compared to 25.3% of non-users; P < 0.005). The overall majority of service users 96 (99.7%) had a positive experience of the screening service, agreeing that they were

given enough time and pharmacists made them feel at ease. Only 9% of non-users were aware of the pharmacy service and, although the majority (78.4%) were willing to be screened at a pharmacy, this was significantly lower among males than females (69.9 compared to 82.7%; P < 0.005). Perceived concerns about confidentiality and lack of privacy were among selleck screening library barriers identified to taking up screening. Conclusion  Pharmacy-based CVD screening is acceptable to the public. Its uptake could be improved through increased awareness of the service and by addressing concerns about privacy and confidentiality in promotional activities. “
“Objectives  The aim was to investigate community pharmacists’ views on the implementation of the electronic Minor Ailment Service (e-MAS) in Scottish community pharmacies and to quantify the barriers and facilitators to service provision. Methods  A postal cross-sectional survey of all community pharmacies in Scotland (n = 1138) was conducted. A combination of open, closed and Likert-type questions were used. Key findings  A response rate of 49.5% was achieved.