Hadza women and juveniles are similar to shod U.S. runners and inexperienced runners such as the Daasanach in preferring RFS, and use comparable joint kinematics to achieve these foot strikes. This pattern of foot strike usage suggests running experience may be important in developing

foot strike LY2109761 concentration preferences. As children learn to walk and their gait matures, RFS develops as a normal part of the walking gait cycle;20 thus RFS is the behavior learned first. As the musculoskeletal system and motor control develop further during adolescence, experience running barefoot or minimally shod may lead to a preference for MFS or FFS during running, perhaps in response to the high impact forces21 experienced when running with RFS. Individuals who rarely run might not have the same accumulated experience of high impact forces due Cyclopamine purchase to RFS, and thus never switch from RFS to MFS or FFS for running. Our data are cross-sectional and do not provide the ontogenetic data or other measures of personal history and experience that longitudinal studies might afford. Nonetheless, the pattern of foot strike use among the Hadza are consistent with the hypothesis that running experience and skill play a role in shaping foot strike behavior.

Hadza adolescents used RFS almost exclusively. Indeed, the only two adolescents that used MFS were also the oldest (13- and 14-year-old boys). Hadza women apparently maintain this preference Carnitine dehydrogenase for RFS into adulthood, while Hadza men come to prefer MFS. We suggest that the change in foot strike behavior by Hadza men may develop as they learn to hunt and track wild game. While Hadza men do not typically

engage in endurance running, it is likely that they run more often as they learn to hunt than their female counterparts do in learning to gather plant foods. Indeed, our measurements of travel speeds used while out of camp on forays, taken using wearable GPS devices,16 indicate that men use running speeds approximately twice as often as women (Fig. 3). Perhaps men’s running experience, and the greater impact force experienced during RFS, lead Hadza men to prefer running with MFS as their foraging efforts and experience grow. An alternative explanation for the observed differences in foot strike usage between Hadza men and women, and between Hadza children and adult men, is that adult men experience larger ground reaction forces due to their greater body mass and running speed, leading to proprioceptive responses in foot strike preference. Hadza men in this sample were 10.0% heavier than women (p = 0.04, t test) and 5.4% taller (p = 0.01, t test) and, as noted above, used faster running speeds than women. While we did not measure ground forces in this study, the difference in mass and speed suggests men would have experienced correspondingly larger ground forces.