2005).

Responses were on a four-item Likert scale from “none/never” to “always.” Parents completed this scale about the attention behaviors of their children. The total sum and subscale sums for attention and motor questions were analyzed. Spatial working memory The SWM paradigm was developed using Flash (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA) and designed to be identical in structure and design to one used in multiple center studies at UCLA (Cannon et al. 2002). Upon launch, a new window was opened and maximized on the participant’s screen. After a brief practice to orient the participants and instruct on the Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical proper response keys, participants performed four selleck chem inhibitor blocks of 16 trials. Data were collected in real-time on the client machine and sent back to the server at the end of each trial block using a 128-bit encrypted connection to avoid recording reaction times (RT) over the network. In this task, participants saw 1, Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical 3, 5, or 7 dots presented on the screen in an abstract array

for 2000 msec. After a Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical delay of 3000 msec, a “probe” dot appeared for 3000 msec. and participants pressed one of two keys designated on the keyboard as to whether the probe dot was in the previously presented array or not. Working memory load (number of dots) was randomized across trials. Both RT and accuracy at each level of load were used as dependent variables. Prior to analysis, we did some initial data quality assurance, by excluding individuals who did not complete

Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical at least two blocks of trials and individuals who responded less than chance across multiple blocks. We also removed trials where participants responded in under 300 msec. Stop signal task The stop signal task has also been used extensively at UCLA (e.g., Cohen et al. 2010). We again designed a version in Flash with high face validity to one of the several versions used at Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical UCLA. Participants saw either a left- or right-pointing arrow on the screen for 1000 msec and had to respond similarly using the arrow keys (inverted-t) on the keyboard. On 25% of the trials an auditory “beep” was presented and participants Batimastat had to withhold their key press. The timing of the beep is adaptive and based on two alternating ladders (10 msec steps) in an attempt to find an optimized stopping time, while not allowing the selleck inhibitor participant to learn from a single ladder (Logan and Bundesen 2003). During instructions and practice, participants also performed a “speaker check” to ensure they could hear the auditory beep. The stop signal reaction time (SSRT) is typically the primary dependent variable, but also is highly sensitive to strategy effects (i.e., waiting, Logan and Bundesen 2003).